Recent U.S.-UAE talks, surprisingly focused on Sudan, highlighted the urgent need for peace over military solutions, according to journalist Mohamed Hereika. Both countries emphasized restoring civilian governance and addressing humanitarian crises resulting from the Sudan conflict. Hereika noted the UAE’s diplomatic role amid accusations of its support for the paramilitary RSF, questioning its ability to mediate despite ongoing allegations from Sudan’s Armed Forces. He advocated for dialogue as the solution to end the conflict.
In a surprising turn of events, recent discussions between U.S. President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Emirati President Mohammed Bin Zayed centered on Sudan, diverging from anticipated conversations concerning the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. Journalist and political analyst Mohamed Hereika expressed astonishment at this focus during an interview with Radio Dabanga, emphasizing the significance of the U.S. officially recognizing the UAE as a “major defense partner.” Mr. Hereika observed that both nations underscored the futility of seeking a military resolution to the crises in Sudan, advocating instead for immediate efforts to cease hostilities and reinstate a civilian-led government. He highlighted the shared perspective between the U.S. and the UAE regarding the need for a peaceful resolution amidst escalating tensions from certain factions within Sudan’s ruling authorities directed towards the UAE. Furthermore, Mr. Hereika reaffirmed the UAE’s dedication to fostering a peaceful outcome, particularly concerning the challenges faced by Sudanese refugees in Chad. A circulating video depicted a refugee imploring the UAE to cease its support of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Underlining the import of the UAE’s status as a U.S. defense partner, he conveyed that this designation enhances its regional influence while addressing allegations of UAE’s support for the RSF. Hereika mentioned that while international organizations have issued warnings about regional interference concerning Sudan, direct accusations against the UAE have not been levied. This statement comes on the heels of a recent report by The New York Times detailing the UAE’s purported backing of the RSF, yet Hereika expressed surprise that diplomatic relations between Sudan and the UAE remain stable despite intensifying allegations. He raised concerns about the UAE’s role in mediating the conflict, considering the Sudanese Armed Forces’ accusations of bias that have led to their withdrawal from past diplomatic talks in Geneva. Mr. Hereika reiterated the essential nature of dialogue as a means to resolve conflict, stating, “All wars eventually end at the negotiating table,” and advocating for decisive political action to avert further humanitarian crises. Both the U.S. and the UAE have recommitted themselves to pursuing a peaceful resolution for Sudan.
The recent diplomatic discussions between the United States and the United Arab Emirates have brought Sudan to the forefront, highlighting the complexities of international relations in the region. The absence of focus on more commonly discussed global conflicts such as Ukraine and Gaza during these high-stakes meetings signals a shifting priority toward Sudan’s humanitarian and governance crises. The U.S. declaration of the UAE as a major defense partner further complicates their relationship with Sudan, especially in light of growing tensions and allegations of military support for the RSF from certain factions within Sudan’s government. Understanding the dynamics of these discussions is crucial, as they suggest a strategic pivot towards stability in Sudan amid international scrutiny of all involved parties.
In conclusion, the emphasis on Sudan in the recent U.S.-UAE talks underscores a critical shift in diplomatic priorities, emphasizing the urgent need for peace and stability in the region. The recognition of the UAE as a major defense partner by the U.S. potentially amplifies its influence in mediating the Sudan crisis, despite ongoing accusations and the complexity of regional alliances. Mohamed Hereika’s insights advocate for dialogue as the only viable path forward to resolve the conflict and prevent further humanitarian disasters, reiterating that international cooperation is pivotal in addressing Sudan’s challenges.
Original Source: www.dabangasudan.org
