Peru’s Congress has enacted a law imposing severe restrictions on NGOs, banning them from suing the state for human rights abuses and increasing scrutiny of foreign funding. Rights groups condemn the law as a threat to justice and human rights. Supporters argue it promotes transparency.
On March 14, 2025, Peru’s Congress passed a contentious reform to its international cooperation law, which critics assert will severely impact non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This legislation introduces significant restrictions, including a prohibition against NGOs taking legal action against the state for human rights violations.
The newly enacted provisions classify it as a “serious offense” for civil society organizations to provide legal assistance or funding for lawsuits against the state. Furthermore, the law imposes greater scrutiny on foreign funding for these organizations, potentially endangering their operations.
NGOs have expressed deep concerns regarding this law, suggesting it may undermine their capacity to represent vulnerable communities and combat corruption. Promsex, an NGO focused on women’s sexual and reproductive rights, denounced the law, asserting it limits access to justice and fosters continued impunity. Meanwhile, the Legal Defense Institute labeled the law a severe infringement on the right to a proper defense and effective judicial protection.
Additionally, the Press and Society Institute portrayed the legislation as reminiscent of authoritarian measures seen elsewhere in Latin America, highlighting a concerning trend in governance.
Proponents of the legislation argue that it enhances transparency and accountability for NGOs. Right-wing congressman Alejandro Munante criticized NGOs, claiming they lack accountability, evade taxes, and unduly influence the country’s political landscape. Following the passage, the government has two weeks to either enact the law or return it to Congress with suggested modifications.
Peru’s recent law restricting NGO activities has sparked significant criticism from rights organizations, which argue it threatens human rights advocacy and accountability. Supporters claim it will improve transparency. The upcoming enactment decision will be crucial for the future of civil society in Peru.
Original Source: www.dw.com
