Lebanon and Israel are embarking on US-sponsored indirect talks to resolve border disputes, forming committees to address issues stemming from the 2006 conflict. Five prisoners were recently released as a goodwill gesture amid these negotiations, which focus on disputed territories and security arrangements without leading to normalizing relations. The process adheres to UN Resolution 1701, with ongoing tensions between the nations.
In recent developments, Lebanon and Israel have initiated US-sponsored indirect talks concerning outstanding border disputes. These discussions, as reported by Al Mayadeen on March 12, aim to form three committees dedicated to persistently addressing longstanding issues without implying normalization between the two nations. Such efforts are characterized as a continuation of the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which guided post-war relations.
The discussions focus on various critical aspects, particularly disputes from the 2006 conflict. These include addressing territorial concerns, notably the five points of land occupied by Israel since the war and issues surrounding prisoners. The intent, according to sources, is to clarify misunderstandings regarding the purpose of these committees.
An Israeli official has articulated that the ultimate goal of the committees is to pave the way toward normalization. This sentiment was echoed during a remark to the Times of Israel, emphasizing the necessity of advancing into official diplomatic discussions. Furthermore, five Lebanese prisoners were released by Israel as a goodwill gesture accompanying these talks, heralding a new chapter in diplomatic relations.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office confirmed that this release is part of a broader US-sponsored initiative, also involving France, aimed at forming working groups to resolve the border dispute. The US envoy to the region, Morgan Ortagus, reiterated the aim of these discussions, emphasizing the resolution of outstanding issues, including the return of prisoners and disputed border points along the contested Blue Line.
Significantly, thirteen specific disputed areas have been identified, including Ras al-Naqoura, Marwahin, and several locations in Alma al-Shaab, as well as other key points in southern Lebanon that Israel has occupied since the 2006 ceasesfire. Israel continues to challenge Lebanon’s territorial integrity by frequently conducting military operations, claiming the necessity of enforcing a ceasefire agreement meant to dismantle Hezbollah’s military presence and prevent rearmament activities.
Despite the ongoing tensions, Israel asserts that its actions are within the confines of the agreement signed post-war. It argues that Hezbollah’s failure to fully withdraw from the contested areas underscores the need for Israeli oversight, as the Lebanese army is mandated to eliminate any militant infrastructure south of the Litani River. The situation remains tense, as allegations persist regarding Hezbollah’s expansion and Israel’s militaristic responses.
In summary, Lebanon and Israel have recommenced indirect talks regarding their border disputes through US-backed committees. These discussions are framed as a continuation of the adherence to UN Resolution 1701 and do not hint towards normalization of relations. Key topics under negotiation include the delineation of disputed territories and the release of prisoners, alongside addressing security concerns related to Hezbollah. The situation remains complex, with ongoing military actions impacting peace efforts.
Original Source: thecradle.co
