The PCCA has criticized IGAD for misrepresenting the situation in South Sudan, challenging claims regarding the effectiveness of the R-ARCSS and its role as a peace framework. They argue that current violence is rooted in political succession issues rather than the agreement itself, urging for a genuine national dialogue involving all political factions. The coalition emphasizes the necessity for inclusive processes to secure a democratic future for the country.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) has expressed profound dissatisfaction with the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) regarding its recent report and communiqué on South Sudan’s situation. The PCCA challenges the assertion that the 2018 Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) is the foundation of peace, citing a historical context of failures in its implementation as documented by the Revitalized Joint Monitoring and Evaluation Commission (RJMEC). The coalition condemns both the claims in IGAD’s report and the subsequent actions of President Salva Kiir, which have contributed to continued instability and conflict in the region.
Furthermore, the PCCA critiques IGAD’s announcement of a Ministerial-level subcommittee to oversee South Sudan’s crisis management, arguing that it lacks clarity and thoroughness necessary for addressing the root causes of instability. The coalition believes that the vague mission of this subcommittee fails to provide a solid framework for future peace or progress. They contend that previously established regional bodies should suffice in overseeing peace efforts without necessitating additional, redundant committees.
The PCCA argues that the turmoil in South Sudan is fundamentally tied to political succession dynamics rather than issues directly related to the R-ARCSS. Speculations about President Kiir’s potential departure and the rise of Dr. Benjamin Bol Mel as his successor have intensified political apprehensions. The coalition asserts that IGAD’s focus on the R-ARCSS is misplaced and calls for a broader examination of the changing political landscape.
In light of these findings, the PCCA posits that both the R-ARCSS and regional initiatives are no longer viable in addressing the present challenges facing South Sudan. They advocate for a restructuring of political dialogue towards inclusive and democratic processes, emphasizing the need for both President Kiir and Dr. Riek Machar to step back from active politics. Instead, the coalition calls for a national dialogue to pave the way for a constitutional agreement and electoral processes that prioritize the will of the South Sudanese people.
In conclusion, the PCCA’s statement underscores the pressing need for IGAD and regional stakeholders to reassess their approach towards South Sudan, emphasizing the importance of addressing contemporary challenges rather than adhering to outdated frameworks. They assert that a failure to do so could precipitate further chaos, risking both national and regional stability. The coalition firmly believes that only through genuine dialogue and reform can South Sudan progress towards a peaceful and democratic future, asserting that any alternative will pose a significant threat to the country’s integrity and security.
In summary, the PCCA has called for a critical reassessment of IGAD’s approach towards South Sudan, emphasizing the ineffectiveness of the R-ARCSS in addressing current realities. The coalition advocates for comprehensive political dialogue that includes all stakeholders, urging for the removal of existing political leaders who perpetuate conflict. The PCCA’s call to action highlights the necessity for concrete solutions that prioritize the people’s needs and aspirations to avoid further instability in both South Sudan and the broader region.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
