The article discusses competing plans for governing Gaza after the war, highlighting proposals from President Trump, Israeli leader Yair Lapid, and Egypt. Each plan faces significant obstacles, especially without a stable cease-fire. The complexities surrounding Hamas’s role and international support are also examined, emphasizing the need for a viable governance solution to ensure lasting peace.
The ongoing conflict in Gaza has led to significant uncertainty regarding who will govern the territory after the war concludes. Addressing this governance issue is vital for establishing a permanent cease-fire and ensuring lasting peace in the area. Without a comprehensive plan accommodating both Israeli and Palestinian interests, a commitment to halt hostilities remains elusive.
The future governance of Gaza post-war presents complex challenges. Three main proposals from key figures namely, President Trump, Yair Lapid, and Egypt offer varying solutions, yet all face substantial hurdles that hinder progress. Achieving a stable political framework in Gaza mandates a cooperative and effective cease-fire, coupled with widespread international endorsement and financial support. The ongoing presence of Hamas complicates matters further, emphasizing the urgency for a clear pathway to peace.
Original Source: foreignpolicy.com
