The EU lifted some sanctions on Syria ahead of the national dialogue, but full relief depends on the interim government’s reforms. Experts urge lifting sanctions to facilitate recovery, with concerns over humanitarian conditions worsening. Critics highlight that without substantial changes, Syria risks renewed conflicts and instability, complicating efforts for an effective transition.
On February 25, the Syrian Arab Republic initiated a national dialogue in Damascus, to which the European Union responded positively by lifting some sanctions on the deposed Bashar Assad regime. However, comprehensive sanction relief remains uncertain, as Western leaders are skeptical of the regime’s commitment to an inclusive administration capable of implementing necessary reforms. The EU’s February 24 announcement lifted certain restrictions immediately, including those pertaining to oil and gas, and also eased banking bans to facilitate humanitarian aid and reconstruction.
The EU’s action precedes Syria’s interim government’s national dialogue, led by President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, who promised an inclusive transitional government. Despite allegations of rushed preparations, the forum drew around 600 delegates and is considered a significant step towards drafting a new constitution and reorganizing the country’s economy. Nonetheless, experts emphasize that lifting sanctions is crucial for Syria’s economic recovery and political transition.
Experts from organizations like the International Crisis Group and the Middle East Institute argue that without sanction relief, rebuilding Syria’s economy and enabling citizen participation in political processes will be nearly impossible. “Lifting sanctions is crucial at this moment to promote a stable and peaceful political transition in Syria,” stated Nanar Hawach, a Syrian analyst. The negative impact of sanctions on daily life and institutional efficacy has been reiterated by other analysts and rights groups, alluding to the humanitarian crisis plaguing the population.
Concerns over US sanctions have hindered financial support for Syria’s infrastructure, with Qatar recently delaying pledged funds due to these restrictions. The EU signaled that sanction relief depends on the interim government’s capability to implement reforms, cautioning that sanctions could be reinstated if the new authorities fail to fulfill promised changes. Analysts warn that delays in sanction easing may compromise Syria’s nascent transition towards stability.
The EU’s reluctance springs from the need for assurances of inclusive governance amid fears among minority groups regarding their safety under the newly established HTS-led government. Al-Sharaa faces the dual challenge of satisfying both liberal and conservative factions while managing expectations from external stakeholders. Reports suggest potential delays in establishing a functional government, with ramifications for sanction policies thus far.
Economic experts and humanitarian organizations urge immediate action on sanction relief to prevent exacerbating Syria’s existing crisis. Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, emphasized that sanctions, while targeting the Assad regime, have worsened conditions for everyday Syrians. The sanctions, predominantly enforced by the US, have been in place for over four decades and have severely impaired the country’s economic recovery following over 13 years of civil conflict.
Despite some easing of sanctions, crucial restrictions remain that could hinder Syria’s reconciliation and recovery. Analysts express concern that linking sanction relief to performance could be detrimental, as many sectors remain fragile and vulnerable to renewed violence. Observers maintain that urgent sanction lifts, even if gradual, are essential to fostering stability in post-Assad Syria and restoring economic function.
As the humanitarian situation worsens daily, the impact of sanctions on ordinary Syrians has become more dire, with a significant portion living at or below the poverty line. Aljazaeri highlighted the risk of fragmentation among essential resources, given the breakdown of established support networks following Assad’s fall. The call for economic stabilization correlates with a demand for more robust governance mechanisms that would allow the new government to address the urgent challenges faced by its populace.
While easing sanctions is viewed as essential for recovery, some analysts caution that it must be paired with internal reforms by the new administration, which remains deeply divided and polarized post-conflict. The road to reconciling diverse interests within Syria is complex, necessitating decisive leadership capable of fostering a cohesive national identity, making the challenges ahead even more daunting.
In summary, the potential for Syria’s recovery and political reform hinges on the lifting of sanctions that have paralyzed its economy and undermined its social fabric. Experts from various organizations highlight the urgent need for comprehensive economic support to stabilize the country in light of the new administration’s promise for reform. Without such measures, concerns about renewed conflict and instability persist, underscoring the intricate balance necessary for a successful transition in Syria’s political landscape.
Original Source: www.arabnews.com
