Clashes between the SSPDF and armed civilians in South Sudan highlight a significant trust deficit. The relationship between the military and civilians is essential for stability. To improve perceptions, the SSPDF should engage communities through various initiatives, healthcare support, and public events, building a foundation of trust and collaboration.
In South Sudan’s Nasir County, conflict erupts between the South Sudan People’s Defense Force (SSPDF) and civilians known as the “White Army.” These violent encounters signify a deteriorating trust between citizens and their military. Such clashes are not unique; in August 2020, a disarmament effort in Warrap State resulted in over 80 civilian deaths due to similar skirmishes.
The relationship between civilians and the military is crucial for South Sudan’s stability. Without strengthening this connection, establishing a modern military will be challenging. While military technology has advanced, the core of an effective army relies on human interaction and community relations.
To improve its image, the SSPDF should prioritize engagement with civilians. This could begin with the creation of a “military-civil engagement manual,” guiding officers on effective community interaction. Moreover, military bases could transform into community assets by initiating projects like drilling boreholes to provide local populations with access to clean water.
The historical context is significant. During the liberation struggle from 1983 to 2005, the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) thrived on civilian support. However, the current SSPDF, funded by government resources, now bears the responsibility of minimizing civilian dependency, ensuring effective service delivery to the communities they serve.
Healthcare initiatives could further bridge the gap between the SSPDF and civilians. Establishing health centers near military bases would not only serve soldiers but also provide essential healthcare to surrounding communities, which would enhance the military’s reputation. Initiatives such as ambulance services and health education could further foster goodwill.
Public engagement is essential for building trust. Organizing monthly public rallies in collaboration with local leaders and international organizations could address public concerns and clarify the SSPDF’s mission. Engaging discussions in local languages would enhance understanding and promote inclusivity.
Implementing monthly community service days where soldiers participate in local projects can strengthen community ties. Troop rotation policies would also benefit interactions with various communities, allowing soldiers to learn and respect diverse cultures, which is key to national unity.
Ensuring internal discipline is critical. Each unit should have a mechanism to address accusations of human rights violations. Accountability builds public confidence in the SSPDF, reinforcing its justice commitment.
Utilizing local media effectively may enhance communication. By coordinating with community leaders to host radio discussions, military officials can address security concerns and cultivate a better relationship with the public.
In conclusion, the SSPDF should concentrate on enhancing its two pivotal departments—an information department for actionable insights and a civil affairs division for continuous public engagement. Establishing a strong bond between the military and civilians will take time and dedication, but if executed correctly, the SSPDF can evolve into a true army of the people.
Strengthening the relationship between the SSPDF and the South Sudanese population is vital for national stability. Engagement strategies, healthcare initiatives, and community involvement can improve public perception and foster trust. By focusing on accountability, discipline, and effective communication, the SSPDF can potentially transform into a people-oriented military, gaining the confidence and support of its citizens.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
