Costa Rica abstained from a UN resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, despite initially co-sponsoring it. The resolution, which emphasized Ukraine’s sovereignty, received 93 votes in favor and drew criticism from former leaders in Costa Rica. Ambassador Maritza Chan did not elaborate on the reasons for the abstention, raising questions about the nation’s foreign policy commitments.
Costa Rica abstained from voting on a UN resolution that condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, despite having previously co-sponsored the initiative. The resolution not only denounced Russia’s actions but also reaffirmed support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, garnering 93 votes in favor, 18 against, and 65 abstentions. The resolution calls for an immediate end to hostilities and demands the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukrainian territory based on internationally recognized borders.
Ambassador Maritza Chan, representing Costa Rica at the UN, declined to clarify the rationale behind the abstention when questioned by local media. This decision has drawn criticism from various leaders, including former president Laura Chinchilla, who lamented, “What a shame!” highlighting that such a stance undermines the nation’s foreign policy principles. Chinchilla expressed concern that this position compromises Costa Rica’s commitment to international law and could invite further aggression in the region.
Additionally, former President Miguel Angel Rodriguez voiced his dismay, stating, “I am deeply hurt by Costa Rica’s refraining from defending the principle of Ukraine’s territorial integrity.” He emphasized that the decision contradicts Costa Rica’s historical stance against aggression and disrespects the territorial sovereignty of nations. As of now, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has yet to provide any reasoning for the abstention.
Costa Rica’s abstention from the UN vote on the Russia-Ukraine issue raises significant concerns regarding its commitment to international law and foreign policy. This decision has faced criticism from former leaders, emphasizing the importance of defending national interests and upholding territorial integrity. The lack of explanation from the Costa Rican government regarding this shift further adds to the complexities surrounding its diplomatic stance on global conflicts.
Original Source: ticotimes.net
