Iran’s military retreat from Syria’s bases has exposed chaos and panic, as significant remnants of their decade-long presence remain behind. The abrupt exit, prompted by swift escalations in conflict and internal rifts, showcases a breakdown of trust with Syrian allies while shifting local sentiment towards Iranian forces, favoring a more neutral relationship with Russia.
The abandoned Iranian military base in Syria reveals a hasty retreat marked by signs of panic. Left behind are moldy food, discarded uniforms, and abandoned weapons, indicative of an abrupt departure from a site that had been active for over a decade. Iran had established itself as a crucial ally to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, deploying military advisers and foreign militias while creating extensive underground networks to support its operations against perceived threats, particularly from Israel.
Located near Khan Shaykhun in Idlib province, this base, known as The Position of Martyr Zahedi, was critical to Iranian operations until the regime’s collapse in December. Evidence suggests that even in the final moments of their presence, daily life continued at the base, as indicated by recent supplies ordered. However, the base’s new occupants, armed Uyghur fighters from Hayaat Tahrir al-Sham, indicate a significant shift in control and presence in the area.
The base’s infrastructure includes a labyrinth of tunnels, bunk beds, and remnants of Iranian culture, with documents revealing sensitive information about Iranian fighters, including the presence of Afghan brigade members. Iran justified its military role in Syria by claiming to combat extremist groups while protecting Shia interests. Yet, the final decision to retreat came suddenly, with orders received at the last minute for the forces to leave with minimal possessions.
Eyewitness accounts reveal how swiftly the opposing forces advanced, culminating in a collapse of trust between Assad and his Iranian allies. This internal rift, compounded by external Israeli airstrikes escalated by events in Lebanon, led to the unravelling of the Iranian command structure. As Iranian forces departed, local reactions demonstrated widespread relief mixed with lingering resentment over the years of occupation.
Locals expressed that interactions with Iranian forces were particularly uncomfortable, as many of them did not speak the language and treated residents with suspicion. In contrast, the Russian military presence evoked a more neutral or even favorable perception. The aftermath of Iran’s involvement in Syria leaves a complex legacy, with local authorities now implementing bans on Iranian nationals while maintaining ambivalence towards Russia, reflecting a significant shift in Syrian attitudes and alliances.
The rapid retreat of Iranian forces from their bases in Syria marks a dramatic shift in the region’s power dynamics, revealing internal strife and a loss of credibility. The evidence of their hastily abandoned military presence highlights a decade of strategic investment by Iran that has now unraveled. Local sentiment toward Iranian forces has turned largely negative, showcasing a desire for a more stable political relationship, especially with Russia, in the newly emerging Syrian landscape.
Original Source: www.bbc.com
