South Sudan’s authorities have imposed a social media ban for up to 90 days amid unrest. This measure targets the circulation of sensitive information, following violent protests related to killings of South Sudanese in Sudan. Journalists have resorted to VPNs for access, raising concerns about information dissemination during this critical period.
Following recent unrest in South Sudan, the National Communication Authority issued a directive to internet service providers to block access to social media platforms for a minimum of 30 days. This order was prompted by concerns over the spread of violent protests and footage depicting killings of South Sudanese nationals in neighboring Sudan. Authorities imposed a curfew in response to escalating violence, including acts of retribution against Sudanese nationals within the country.
The ongoing unrest in South Sudan has led to significant tensions and violence, particularly related to events in neighboring Sudan. The social media ban is purportedly aimed at curbing the dissemination of content that could incite further violence. Access to reliable information is crucial for journalists and the public, especially during times of conflict; thus, the Committee to Protect Journalists is advocating for the lifting of this ban to ensure transparency and informed discourse.
In summary, South Sudan has enacted a social media ban to mitigate unrest and prevent the spread of inflammatory content. This action has raised concerns among journalists and human rights advocates regarding the impact on information access in the region. The Committee to Protect Journalists emphasizes the need for an open internet during crises, underscoring the importance of fostering communication in times of social turmoil.
Original Source: news.az
