Derek O’Brien, TMC MP, emphasized in Rajya Sabha that the Indian Constitution is a dynamic entity influencing everyday life rather than a static document. He criticized the ‘one nation, one election’ bill, advocating for federalism and urging the government to address women’s underrepresentation in Parliament. Various political representatives echoed concerns about inclusivity and the integrity of democratic processes.
In a recent session of the Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien, a Member of Parliament from the Trinamool Congress (TMC), asserted that the Constitution of India transcends its textual existence, describing it as a “living, breathing document on the streets of India.” His remarks coincided with the introduction of the ‘one nation, one election’ bill in the Lok Sabha, which he criticized, urging for an open dialogue on constitutional matters and emphasizing the importance of federalism in legislative discussions. O’Brien urged the ruling party to consider the implications of their proposals, citing the historical context of the government’s approach to opposition voices in legislative proceedings.
He further highlighted issues concerning the political representation of women in the current Lok Sabha, illustrating a decline from 14.5% in the previous session to 13.5% now. This was part of a broader discourse around inclusivity and representation, where he expressed concern about the increasing marginalization of women within the political framework. O’Brien also accused the central government of co-opting state schemes, specifically mentioning West Bengal’s ‘Swasthya Sathi’ scheme, now rebranded as ‘Ayushman Bharat.’
Support from various political figures was evident during the session, with P P Suneer of the CPI discussing discrimination faced by Dalits, Adivasis, and minorities despite government assertions of inclusivity. M Rao Yadav Beedha of the TDP remarked on the constitutional principle of equality, while P Girirajan of the DMK criticized the governing party for alleged unethical political practices aimed at undermining elected state governments. Such discussions underscore ongoing concerns regarding the efficacy of representation and the health of India’s democratic institutions.
The discourse surrounding the Indian Constitution reflects the ongoing debates about its interpretation and relevance in contemporary governance. The statement by Derek O’Brien highlights the perception that constitutional norms do not merely exist within legal frameworks but actively shape political realities. The introduction of significant legislation, such as the ‘one nation, one election’ bill, often raises questions about the balance of power between state and federal authorities, as well as the responsiveness of parliamentary processes to diverse political voices.
The dialogue initiated by Derek O’Brien in the Rajya Sabha serves as a vital reminder of the Constitution’s dynamic nature in Indian democracy. His comments resonate with broader concerns about representation, federalism, and equitable governance, prompting reflection on the principles of inclusivity enshrined in the Constitution. As political actors continue to navigate complex legislative landscapes, the commitment to uphold democratic values and ensure fair representation remains critical in fostering an equitable society.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
