Former President Edgar Lungu has been barred by Zambia’s Constitutional Court from seeking re-election in 2026 due to having served the constitutional limit of two terms. The court rejected his argument regarding partial term service and confirmed his status as ineligible. This ruling follows his recent nomination by the opposition party, amidst a backdrop of political controversy and changes in judicial personnel.
Zambia’s Constitutional Court has officially ruled that former President Edgar Lungu is ineligible to run for re-election in 2026, having reached the constitutional limit of two presidential terms. Lungu initially took office in January 2015 and has contended that his initial election did not count as a full term since he only served the remaining 20 months of his predecessor’s term. However, the court dismissed this argument, confirming that he has indeed served the maximum terms permitted by law. This ruling follows his recent selection by the opposition to contest the upcoming elections against current President Hakainde Hichilema, illustrating the contentious nature of Zambian politics.
Lungu’s political comeback was further complicated by the withdrawal of his retirement benefits after he chose to re-enter active politics. His attempt to strengthen his public image involved jogging publicly alongside supporters, an effort designated by law enforcement as “political activism.” Furthermore, the recent dismissal of three judges who had permitted Lungu’s candidacy in past elections has sparked controversy among his supporters. The government has expressed satisfaction with the ruling, emphasizing its role in ensuring the integrity of future elections in Zambia.
The legal status of presidential terms in Zambia has evolved significantly, particularly following the death of former President Michael Sata in 2014 and the subsequent election of Edgar Lungu. Under the amended constitution, if a president dies in office, the vice president is automatically elevated to the presidency. This change, coupled with subsequent judicial interpretations, has led to debates regarding term limits and eligibility for re-election for presidents in Zambia. Lungu’s two terms have been contentious, reflecting a broader struggle for political legitimacy and compliance with constitutional provisions within the Zambian political landscape.
In summary, the Constitutional Court’s decision effectively bars former President Edgar Lungu from future presidential elections, reinforcing Zambia’s constitutional term limits. The ruling comes amidst ongoing political tensions, particularly with the re-emergence of Lungu in the opposition with aspirations to challenge the incumbent president. This development underscores the complexities of Zambian democracy and the legal frameworks that govern it, which aim to uphold electoral fairness and integrity moving forward into the 2026 elections.
Original Source: www.bbc.com
