The Arab League summit in Baghdad showcased Iraq’s economic strides, but significant criticism emerged over low attendance of regional leaders and ongoing sectarian divides. Despite Iraq’s pledges for aid and infrastructure growth, the event largely reflected a missed opportunity for asserting regional influence amid external pressures and internal challenges.
In the aftermath of the recent Arab League summit held in Baghdad, opinions diverge sharply about its success or failure. Set against a backdrop of ongoing crises—such as the genocide in Gaza and conflicts in countries like Sudan, Libya, Yemen, and Lebanon—the summit, which occurred on May 17, sparked debate among political analysts. While state media highlighted Iraq’s financial commitments to regional aid, many detractors deemed the event a disappointment, expressing doubt about Iraq’s panorama, suggesting it is both flourishing and faltering simultaneously.
Walking through Baghdad, there are striking developments. The airport boasts newly constructed pathways adorned with bright imagery of historical landmarks like the hanging gardens of Babylon. Numerous construction activities suggest a facade of economic vitality, particularly with the upcoming elections prompting hotel expansions, including a Movenpick among others. Still, the event raised eyebrows: the summit’s press center hosted minimal international journalists, raising questions about the transparency of the event.
The architectural theme of the summit drew comparisons to past ambitious projects, notably Saddam Hussein’s failed Non-Aligned Nations meeting preparations in the ‘80s. Many analysts attribute the ongoing infrastructural growth to the improved security situation under Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani. Conversely, visible Iranian militia flags along the airport road hint at external influences overshadowing Iraq’s sovereignty, stirring unease amongst proponents of true Iraqi autonomy.
The summit saw substantial investments in logistics and transport, with state-of-the-art vehicles for the delegations, yet the participation rate was low. Of the twenty heads of state invited, only a mere five attended. The Emir of Qatar left before speaking, prompting questions regarding the commitment of Gulf leaders. Observers noted the heavy presence of nations like Egypt and Palestine, but their influence appeared muted compared to geopolitical maneuvering elsewhere in the region.
The event’s chaotic energy contrasted sharply with an overshadowing diplomatic narrative involving U.S. engagements with Gulf leaders just prior to the summit. Donald Trump’s meeting with regional leaders blurred the spotlight on Baghdad, revealing tensions over the summit’s significance. Analysts argue that while the Arab League remains relevant to many, its framework excessively prioritizes regime survival over authentic collaboration.
Despite hopes for unity, signs pointed to broader sectarian divides weighing on Iraq’s future. Sudani’s invitation to the Syrian representative fell through amid political squabbles, emphasizing the struggle for regional integration. Expert Nahro Zagros outlined the consequences on Iraq’s credibility, particularly lamenting the military influence of armed militias that stifle constructive dialogue.
Moreover, discussions of a proposed Arab Common Market unveiled a stark reality: internal trade remains minimal. Iraq’s economic stability remains highly oil-dependent, and a decline in oil prices could lead to significant unrest. For Zagros, it paints a worrying picture; underlying complexities threaten the country’s national cohesiveness as sectarian tensions loom large.
Ultimately, Iraq may continue to grapple with its identity on an Arab stage. The summit’s lackluster outcomes highlight the persistent challenges that hinder the nation from achieving a reputable regional role, illuminating how external dynamics often overshadow local aspirations. As the shadow of neighboring powers looms, the struggle for Iraq’s agency persists, perhaps reshaping any dreams of a revitalized Arab leadership in Baghdad.
In conclusion, the Arab League summit in Baghdad has left many questioning Iraq’s regional stature and future prospects. While notable infrastructure developments and financial pledges were showcased, the summit revealed deeper issues of mistrust and sectarian divisions that hinder progress. The significantly low turnout of Arab leaders signified a larger geopolitical landscape overshadowing Iraq’s ambitions. Many observers deem it a missed opportunity for Iraq to assert itself as a central player in the Arab world, with underlying tensions consistently posing threats to stability.
Original Source: www.newarab.com
