The Trump administration is considering a travel ban affecting citizens from 43 countries. A draft lists 11 countries for total entry bans and 10 for restricted access, with ongoing reviews by officials. Changes to the draft are anticipated before final proposals are submitted to the White House.
The Trump administration is contemplating a new travel ban potentially affecting citizens from up to 43 countries, which would extend beyond previous restrictions. A draft list compiled by diplomatic and security officials categorizes countries into three tiers based on the proposed restrictions on entry to the United States.
The draft designates a “red” list comprising 11 countries whose citizens would be entirely prohibited from entering the United States. These countries include Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.
Various officials, speaking under the condition of anonymity, indicated that this document was created by the State Department weeks ago, and significant modifications may occur before it is presented to the White House. Regional bureau officials and security specialists are currently scrutinizing the draft to verify the accuracy of the provided country assessments and to weigh any relevant policy considerations.
Additionally, an “orange” list features 10 countries where travel restrictions would apply, yet entry would not be completely barred. In these instances, wealthier business travelers might be permitted to enter while individuals on immigrant or tourist visas would be denied entry.
The proposed travel ban draft under the Trump administration reflects significant tightening of entry criteria for individuals from 43 countries. The delineation of restrictions into “red” and “orange” lists indicates a potential shift in immigration policy, with certain nations facing complete entry bans while others may experience restricted access. Continuous review and adjustments by various departments highlight the evolving nature of this initiative.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
