The article discusses the ongoing border dispute between Zimbabwe and Botswana, primarily focused on the location of border beacon BB842, central to tensions arising from the Kazungula Bridge project. Despite multiple diplomatic meetings, including a recent one in December 2023, no resolution has been reached. Both nations maintain their claims of territory overlap, and the matter is currently under the direct purview of the respective presidents, indicating its high significance.
The enduring border dispute between Zimbabwe and Botswana, ignited by the completion of the Kazungula Bridge, persists four years after its inauguration. This $259.3 million infrastructure project has not only improved regional connectivity but has also exacerbated tensions between the two nations surrounding border beacon BB842, a significant point of contention.
The Kazungula Bridge, stretching 923 meters and linking Zambia, Botswana, and Zimbabwe, received funding from both Zambia and Botswana, alongside support from international agencies such as the African Development Bank and the Japan International Cooperation Agency. Unfortunately, this collaborative effort has highlighted territorial disputes rather than fostered cooperation.
At the core of the disagreement is the contested position of border beacon BB842, with Botswana asserting that it has been incorrectly marked. Following a recent border verification survey, Botswana officials raised concerns about the beacon’s placement, complicating an already delicate situation.
Despite a series of diplomatic discussions aimed at resolution, no agreement has been reached. The latest meeting in December 2023, attended by Zimbabwe’s Minister Anxious Masuka and Botswana’s Minister Kefentse Mzwinila, concluded without a resolution, with the negotiation process remaining stalled.
Zimbabwe’s Surveyor General, Edwin Guvaza, indicated that some aspects of the ongoing discussions remain confidential, noting that the engagement has now escalated to a direct dialogue between Presidents Emmerson Mnangagwa and his Botswana counterpart. Attempts to reach Botswana government officials for comment were unsuccessful prior to this report.
The crux of the dispute involves allegations that the Kazungula Bridge infringes upon Zimbabwean territory. Informants suggest that Zimbabwean representatives have substantiated their claims, asserting the bridge overlaps into Zimbabwe’s demarcated land area, which compounds the existing tensions.
According to a source familiar with the matter, “There is a reaffirmation of border beacons, which is a routine periodic exercise, and Botswana decided that the last beacon by the river (Zambezi) BB842 is in the wrong position.” This assertion is actively challenged by Zimbabwe, as both nations remain entrenched in their positions, continuing to pursue diplomacy without resolution.
The border dispute between Zimbabwe and Botswana, stemming from the Kazungula Bridge’s construction, remains unresolved despite ongoing diplomatic efforts. Key issues revolve around the contested location of border beacon BB842, which has led to heightened tensions. While some discussions have occurred, a conclusive agreement has yet to be achieved, and the influence of this dispute continues to strain bilateral relations. Both countries engage in negotiations, illustrating the complexity and sensitivity of territorial matters in the region.
Original Source: bulawayo24.com
