Hezbollah is expressing heightened concerns over potential normalization between Lebanon and Israel, as political leaders assert that such discussions are unacceptable. Lebanon officially denies that negotiations are aimed at normalization, focusing instead on border disputes. The political environment reflects a strong consensus against normalization while recognizing shifting power dynamics. Hezbollah’s leader emphasizes the movement’s role and its rejection of normalization with Israel.
In recent discussions regarding potential normalization between Lebanon and Israel, pressure is increasing within Hezbollah’s ranks. Political sources reported to the pro-Hezbollah newspaper Al-Diyar that both the presidential office and the government in Beirut have deemed any talk of normalization unacceptable. Key reasons include Israel Defense Forces’ control over various strategic points in southern Lebanon and reported violations of the ceasefire agreement.
Lebanon has officially refuted claims that indirect negotiations with Israel could lead to normalization. The talks are concentrated on border disputes, particularly along the land boundary, without involving the Mount Dov area. Nevertheless, the mere existence of such discussions has caused significant concern for Hezbollah and its ally, the Amal Movement.
Political leaders in Beirut emphasized that Lebanon maintains a firm stance against normalization, enjoying widespread consensus on the matter. They indicated that while the present balance of power may appear to favor Israel, the situation is subject to change. These officials asserted that the pro-Iranian axis, which includes Hezbollah, possesses significant leverage yet to be utilized.
According to Lebanese sources, the United States is aware that Lebanon will not pursue normalization. Lebanon will uphold its alignment with the unified Arab position, particularly that advocated by Saudi Arabia, which requires a two-state solution— a proposal Israel currently rejects.
Hezbollah parliament member Ali Fayyad reiterated that Lebanon rejects any normalization with Israel, labeling it an enemy that threatens Lebanon’s identity and interests. He characterized the resistance movement as a popular force that represents the majority in Lebanon and warned relevant parties against underestimating this sentiment. Notably, Hezbollah’s political bloc has lost its parliamentary majority in recent elections, intensifying the discussion on how to navigate this evolving situation.
The balance of power in Lebanon is increasingly complex as discussions about normalization with Israel unfold. Hezbollah expresses strong opposition to any notion of normalization, citing the on-going threats from Israel and asserting its alignment with broader Arab interests. Political leaders affirm Lebanon’s consensus against normalization while acknowledging a shift in power dynamics that could influence future developments. Overall, Hezbollah’s position remains resilient despite recent electoral challenges.
Original Source: www.israelhayom.com
