The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Council has rejected a new constitutional declaration from the Islamist leadership in Damascus, arguing that it inadequately protects community rights. The United Nations calls for an inclusive government and an investigation into recent violence. The SDC demands a decentralized governance model to replace what they view as authoritarianism.
The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Council (SDC) has firmly rejected a constitutional declaration issued by the new Islamist government in Damascus, advocating for its revision. This declaration outlines a five-year interim period under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who recently announced significant constitutional changes after a swift offensive that ousted former President Bashar al-Assad. The Kurdish council criticized that the new framework fails to adequately protect the rights of Syria’s diverse communities, notably emphasizing the necessity for a more inclusive approach to governance.
In Geneva, the United Nations’ special envoy, Geir Pedersen, stressed the importance of establishing a transitional government that encompasses all groups within Syria. He also requested an investigation into recent sectarian violence that has led to numerous fatalities. Pedersen remarked, “Syria now stands at a pivotal moment,” highlighting the need for a collaborative and peaceful resolution to the ongoing conflict.
The Kurds, historically marginalized during Assad’s rule, have developed an autonomous governance system in northeast Syria. They are concerned that the new leadership may undermine their rights, particularly regarding cultural expression and the role of women in governance. The SDC expressed its complete disapproval of Sharaa’s declaration, describing it as an authoritarian approach that consolidates executive power excessively.
The council demanded a constitution that reflects genuine national consensus and promotes a decentralized governance system. They stated, “Any constitutional declaration must be the result of genuine national consensus, not a project imposed by one party,” reinforcing their desire for equitable power distribution.
The SDC, which leads the U.S.-supported Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), recently made a deal to integrate into the new state institutions by handing over key resources to the Damascus government, with implementation expected to conclude by the year’s end. However, specific military integration details remain unclear. Pedersen noted the potential for Sharaa’s declarations to facilitate the restoration of law and order, yet he also recognized the challenges posed by recent sectarian violence, which threatens the transitional process.
In summary, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Council has rejected the constitution proposed by the new Islamist leadership, asserting that it fails to protect the rights of diverse communities in Syria. The United Nations advocates for an inclusive governance structure to enable a peaceful transition, while the SDC emphasizes the importance of a decentralized and consensual governance approach. As the situation evolves, the successful integration of various factions remains critical to ensure stability in Syria.
Original Source: www.usnews.com
