U.N.-backed experts accuse Israel of systematic gender-based violence in Gaza, while Israel denies the claims. An airstrike in Syria resulted in one death; Israel also provided food aid to the Druze minority. The commission’s findings could support war crime prosecutions at the International Criminal Court. Amid these developments, the humanitarian crisis continues to escalate.
Recent statements from United Nations-backed experts have made significant accusations against Israel, claiming the “systematic use of sexual, reproductive and other gender-based violence” in its military actions in Gaza against Hamas. This assertion highlights the serious nature of wartime conduct, which includes extensive destruction and attacks on health facilities, disproportionately affecting women and children. The commission responsible for these findings faced immediate rebuttals from Israel’s mission to the U.N. in Geneva, which rejected the claims as being based on “second-hand, single, uncorroborated sources.” Furthermore, Israel has stated that it has consistently taken measures to mitigate civilian harm during a prolonged conflict that has recently paused under a fragile ceasefire.
In addition to the accusations regarding gender-based violence, Israel’s Defense Minister confirmed an airstrike on a residential building in Syria, which resulted in one reported death. The airstrike targeted a location in Dummar, on the edges of Damascus, believed to be inhabited by Palestinians, and was carried out amid ongoing tensions concerning terrorist activities. The minister further warned of continued military action should terrorist threats persist.
Israel has also extended humanitarian efforts, providing 10,000 food aid packages to the Druze minority in Syria, alongside aims to strengthen relations with this group amid Syria’s civil strife. Despite these outreach efforts, many in the Druze community have dismissed Israel’s advances, claiming that such actions are tactics to fragment Syria, post-Assad’s regime.
The situation remains highly complex, with accusations of gender-based violence and active military engagement in neighboring territories shaping Israel’s international relations and humanitarian narrative. The commission’s report, spearheaded by former U.N. human rights chief Navi Pillay, could serve to substantiate claims of war crimes, given its potential applicability for legal proceedings at the International Criminal Court. The overall context of these events is heightened by the violence that erupted following the October 7 attacks by Hamas, which resulted in considerable civilian casualties on both sides.
In summary, the recent accusations against Israel by U.N.-backed experts regarding systematic gender-based violence highlight serious concerns that arise during wartime. Israel’s defense, emphasizing its caution towards civilian safety, contrasts sharply with international criticisms. The humanitarian outreach to Syrian Druze and military actions against perceived threats further complicate the regional dynamics. The evolving situation necessitates continued monitoring and a balanced discourse concerning accountability and protection of civilians.
Original Source: apnews.com
