The PCCA criticizes IGAD for its assessment of the peace process in South Sudan, asserting that the R-ARCSS has failed and that its claims of reduced conflict are unfounded. They emphasize the need for addressing real political issues and suggest a focus on inclusive dialogue and reform to achieve meaningful stability in the region.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) has expressed grave concerns regarding the recent report from the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) presented at the 43rd Extraordinary Summit pertaining to South Sudan. The PCCA denounced this report and the accompanying communiqué, particularly statements that the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) serves as the foundation of the peace process. PCCA claims such assertions are misleading and detrimental to the pursuit of true peace in South Sudan.
According to PCCA, the report’s narrative that the implementation of the R-ARCSS has led to a reduction in large-scale conflict is unfounded. The Coalition highlighted numerous failures, including ongoing military defections, a lack of unified command, and a continued absence of peace which contradicts claims of the agreement’s effectiveness. The PCCA underscored that many South Sudanese perceive the R-ARCSS as a trap rather than a peacekeeping pact.
The Coalition pointed out that recent violence in places such as Nasir reflects rising discontent with the R-ARCSS framework, indicating it has not effectively resolved conflicts statewide. Moreover, PCCA noted that its failures largely stem from the fact that the ongoing violence disproportionately affects political elites, hence drawing sudden attention from IGAD.
PCCA challenged IGAD’s statements regarding their steps to improve conditions in South Sudan, stating that the vague mandate of a newly proposed Ministerial-level sub-committee fails to address the fundamental issues of instability. The Coalition criticized IGAD’s focus on superficial engagement rather than tackling the root causes of conflict and emphasized the need for a strategic approach to foster lasting peace in South Sudan.
In their analysis, PCCA articulated that the real issue plaguing South Sudan extends beyond the R-ARCSS. They asserted that the turmoil is tied to succession politics surrounding President Kiir and Dr. Benjamin Bol Mel, specifically citing recent political maneuvers that seem to suggest a transition of power. This indicates a need for IGAD to reevaluate its approach to the conflict in light of current realities rather than adhering strictly to outdated narratives.
PCCA warns against conflating South Sudan’s future with the fate of the R-ARCSS, urging IGAD to respond to contemporary political developments more effectively. They called for an inclusive national political dialogue that would facilitate necessary reforms and preparations for elections as a more constructive path forward. The Coalition ultimately believes that without substantial changes, South Sudan risks further fragmentation and regional instability.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action has criticized IGAD’s recent assessments of the peace process in South Sudan, labeling them as misleading and harmful. The PCCA argues that the R-ARCSS has failed to achieve its intended peace objectives and expresses concerns over ongoing violence and political maneuvering in the country. They advocate for a reevaluation of IGAD’s approach to South Sudan, focusing on addressing the actual root causes of conflict and facilitating an inclusive political dialogue for a sustainable future.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
