India is positioned to mediate the Ukraine-Russia conflict due to its neutrality and strategic relationships. With the ongoing negotiations in Riyadh, now is an opportune time for India to facilitate discussions. Acceptability among involved parties and a commitment to its own national interests further support India’s active role in conflict resolution.
India’s external affairs ministry previously expressed its willingness to support peaceful resolutions to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. With Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Kyiv last August, India may now be poised to facilitate an end to the ongoing war. New Delhi’s previous decisions, characterized by neutrality toward Russia and balancing its interests with the West, have proven strategic. However, the evolving dynamics necessitate India’s active involvement on the global stage to influence negotiations effectively.
Currently, vital negotiations occurring in Riyadh present an opportune moment for India to establish itself as a mediator. The present climate indicates a diminishing conflict and a desire for resolution among parties involved. India’s engagement could pave the way for ceasefire discussions while ensuring American participation, given that the Riyadh talks are viewed as needing more substance. Thus, New Delhi should propose its services as a mediator to foster dialogue between the warring nations.
There are three compelling reasons for India to pursue mediation in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. First, the timing is crucial as Russia seeks to alleviate sanctions while initiating discussions with the US. By facilitating dialogue, India could engage with all parties, presenting itself as a trusted intermediary. This collaborative environment is essential for progress toward a peaceful outcome.
Second, India possesses a degree of acceptability among global actors, making our country one of the few potential mediators trusted by both Russia and Ukraine. Unlike China, India is perceived as a neutral entity, which adds to its capacity for effective mediation. Third, taking a substantive role in mediating the conflict aligns with India’s aspirations as a rising global power, creating opportunities for strategic partnerships.
Moreover, should a ceasefire materialize, Ukraine will likely require assurances against future aggression from Russia. India’s experience with peacekeeping could position its forces as a neutral option for peacekeeping duties in the conflict zone. Instead of merely endorsing external peace arrangements, India should assert itself as a leading negotiator and facilitator of lasting peace.
However, India is presently hindered by a reluctance stemming from the fear of failure in mediation efforts. While failures are common in peace negotiations, India’s involvement is more about geopolitical significance than achieving immediate success. As a mediator, the benefits extend beyond conflict resolution to the enhancement of India’s global influence and standing.
In summary, India’s strategic neutrality and relationships with Russia and the West uniquely position it to mediate in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The timing is favorable, given the ongoing negotiations in Riyadh, and India’s acceptability among various powers strengthens its role as a potential facilitator. By addressing its fears of failure and actively pursuing mediation, India could not only promote regional peace but also reinforce its position as a significant global player.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
