The Trump administration is set to propose an expanded travel ban, potentially banning citizens from several countries, including Afghanistan. The new list builds upon previous bans and responds to security concerns, prompting organizations to warn affected populations. Legal challenges may arise as the situation develops.
The Trump administration is advancing plans to implement a new travel ban that would expand upon the restrictions previously enforced during President Trump’s first term. Sources familiar with the administration’s discussions indicate that this proposal includes a ‘red’ list targeting specific countries whose citizens would be prohibited from entering the United States, continuing a policy rooted in Trump’s earlier campaign rhetoric.
Among the countries likely to be included on the proposed red list are those previously affected by the travel bans, including Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. Additionally, Afghanistan is tentatively slated to be added to this list, reflecting concerns about security and immigration policy.
Shawn VanDiver, who leads a nonprofit aiding Afghans affiliated with U.S. forces, reported learning from officials about the intended comprehensive ban on Afghan citizens. This prompted his organization to release an urgent statement advising Afghans holding valid visas abroad to return to the United States immediately, as the ban may soon be instituted.
Subsequent coverage confirmed that Afghanistan is recommended for inclusion in the travel ban, highlighting the administration’s focus on legal and security concerns in shaping its immigration policy. The legal landscape surrounding these restrictions remains contentious, as the prior bans were met with numerous court challenges.
The Trump administration is preparing to unveil a new travel ban that would broaden previous restrictions, particularly impacting citizens of specific countries. A proposed red list includes nations from earlier bans, alongside a new focus on Afghanistan. Urgent alerts for Afghan citizens holding visas underscore the potential implications of these policies on immigration and security. Public response and legal challenges may continue to shape the evolution of these travel restrictions.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
