Sudan is suing the UAE at the ICJ for allegedly arming the RSF, with officials arguing this support prolongs the conflict. The UAE has called the allegations a publicity stunt, while Sudan defends its actions as justified legal recourse under international law regarding the genocide convention.
A political leader from Sudan has articulated the government’s stance on filing a lawsuit against the United Arab Emirates at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Hussein Shingrai, the foreign affairs secretary of the People’s Democratic Party of Sudan, asserts that the military-led government is justified in seeking redress due to the alleged provision of arms to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) by the UAE. He emphasizes that the ongoing conflict could have concluded much earlier without the external assistance provided to the RSF.
On Thursday, the International Court of Justice announced that Sudan has officially accused the UAE of breaching the genocide convention through its support of the RSF. The situation has garnered significant attention, as the Associated Press reports that the UAE has dismissed the allegations, labeling the legal action as a mere publicity stunt. In an interview with VOA’s James Butty, Shingrai highlighted the evidence supporting Sudan’s claims in this high-profile case.
In summary, Sudan’s military-led government defends its decision to pursue legal action against the UAE for allegedly supplying arms to the RSF. The case, presented to the ICJ, highlights serious allegations of violations of the genocide convention. The UAE’s dismissal of these claims as a publicity stunt adds another layer of complexity to the unfolding situation, underscoring the tensions surrounding external influences in the conflict.
Original Source: www.voaafrica.com
