Sudan has submitted a legal case to the International Court of Justice, claiming the UAE violates the Genocide Convention by funding rebels. The ongoing conflict in Sudan has resulted in over 24,000 deaths and the displacement of 14 million people. The case emphasizes concerns regarding foreign support for violent factions and seeks urgent measures to protect vulnerable populations.
Sudan has filed a case against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) at the International Court of Justice, claiming the UAE is violating the Genocide Convention by financially supporting rebel groups in Sudan. The Sudanese government has urged the court to issue urgent provisional measures that would prevent further violence against the Masalit population, who face ongoing threats.
Since mid-April 2023, Sudan has been embroiled in a severe conflict, which erupted due to escalating tensions between its military and paramilitary factions. This civil war has resulted in over 24,000 fatalities and displaced more than 14 million people, representing approximately 30% of the country’s population, according to United Nations estimates. Around 3.2 million Sudanese have sought refuge in neighboring countries due to the violence.
The case was announced shortly after the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and allied groups signed a charter establishing a rival government, coinciding with military gains by Sudan’s armed forces. The Conflict Observatory, backed by the U.S. State Department, reported on aircraft allegedly transporting arms from the UAE to the RSF. The flights reportedly passed through Chad, which the UAE contends were intended for hospital support.
The U.S. Treasury Department previously imposed sanctions in January on RSF leader Mohammad Hamdan Daglo Mousa, known as Hemedti, and seven RSF-owned companies in the UAE, including one involved in smuggling gold. This sanctioning followed the U.S. government’s determination that the RSF’s actions constitute genocide.
The UAE has denied accusations of arming the RSF, despite consistent claims and evidence suggesting otherwise. Two decades ago, the Darfur region of Sudan became infamous for genocide and war crimes perpetrated by the Janjaweed militia against African populations, leading to the deaths of up to 300,000 individuals and displacing 2.7 million more.
It is important to note that decisions made by the International Court of Justice take several years to conclude and are legally enforceable.
Sudan’s case against the UAE at the International Court of Justice highlights serious allegations of genocide and the impact of foreign support on internal conflicts. With significant loss of life and widespread displacement in Sudan, the situation remains dire. As the court deliberates, the implications of its ruling will be crucial for both victims in Sudan and international relations regarding state behavior in conflict zones.
Original Source: battlefordsnow.com
