Algerian and Tunisian leaders’ absence from the Arab Summit reveals their isolation in the Arab world and dissatisfaction with summit preparations. Algeria’s decision stems from perceived exclusion, highlighting its vulnerability amid shifting regional alliances. Furthermore, Algeria’s positions on Palestine, internal conflicts with Morocco, and normalization with Israel showcase deep diplomatic contradictions, underscoring its declining influence in Arab affairs.
In a move that reflects their escalating diplomatic isolation, Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune and Tunisian President Kais Saied opted not to attend the emergency Arab Summit in Cairo on March 4. Alleging flaws in the summit’s preparation, Algeria denounced what it perceived as the monopolization of proceedings by select Arab nations. This decision underscores Algeria’s growing discontent with regional dynamics, especially regarding its strained relations with Morocco.
Tebboune’s absence was attributed to his dissatisfaction with the preparation process, which he claimed excluded significant Arab countries. While sending Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf to represent Algeria, he expressed dismay regarding the handling of the Palestinian issue at the summit, insisting on the need for inclusivity among Arab states to support Palestine, a core concern in the region.
The recent Arab Summit marked a stark contrast to the proud claims made by Tebboune, who previously highlighted the 2022 summit hosted in Algiers. Despite significant investment in its venue, the Algiers summit failed to produce meaningful outcomes for Palestine and ended up being boycotted by several key Arab leaders, illustrating the challenges Algeria faces in asserting its influence within the Arab League.
Underlying Algeria’s rhetoric on Palestinian solidarity is a more self-serving agenda, with the country aligning with Iran’s “axis of resistance.” Following the October 7 conflict, Algeria has aggressively criticized coordination meetings involving Arab states that include Morocco, reflecting its growing marginalization in discussions surrounding the Palestinian issue. This reaction demonstrates a desperation for relevance amid shifting regional alliances.
Gamal Sultan, editor of Al-Masryoon, highlighted the illogical nature of Tebboune’s justifications for his absence, arguing that the real issue lies in Algeria feeling excluded from key discussions about Arab unity regarding Palestine. Discussions on social media further theorized that Algeria’s complaints stem from a recognition of its waning influence within Arab diplomatic circles.
Moreover, Algeria’s hypocrisy is glaring when its support for the Polisario Front is juxtaposed against its claims of supporting Palestinian self-determination. The nation has long funded and armed this separatist group, thereby undermining Morocco while purporting to support Arab solidarity and unity. This contradiction further complicates Algeria’s diplomatic positioning.
In light of discussions among the Gulf states involving Morocco, Algeria expressed concerns over its exclusion, showcasing the diminishing role it plays in new Arab wooden alliances. Algeria’s historical refusal to adapt its policies to align with broader Arab initiatives has led to its current state of isolation.
Recent revelations of Tebboune’s statements suggesting openness to normalize relations with Israel present a sharp contrast to his previous accusations against Morocco for similar actions. He defended this potential shift by referencing historical precedents, thus exposing duplicity in Algeria’s foreign policy regarding Israel, especially given its trade relations with the country despite vocal opposition.
Algeria continues to face criticism for maintaining its ties with Israel while condemning Morocco for pursuing diplomatic relations. These contradictions become even more pronounced when considering recent reports indicating Algeria’s significant exports to Israel, a fact that undermines its official stance against normalization with the Jewish state.
Algeria and Tunisia’s attempts to revive the Maghreb Union without including Morocco illustrate Algeria’s continued isolation. Meetings held between Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya were notably devoid of Moroccan representation, contradicting claims of aiming for unity in the region. The failure to genuinely include all pertinent nations in these discussions raises questions about Algeria’s sincerity in seeking regional cooperation.
Furthermore, the stance of the Arab League consistently aligning with Morocco’s territorial integrity serves as a repudiation of Algeria’s anti-Moroccan efforts. Algeria’s endeavors to obstruct dialogue regarding the Western Sahara issue are counteracted by Morocco’s gaining international support and recognition for its autonomy proposal, reflecting the ongoing shift in the regional power balance.
The absence of Algeria and Tunisia from the Arab Summit illustrates their diminishing influence within the Arab League, driven by Algeria’s isolationist policies and involvement with the Polisario Front. Meanwhile, the contradictions in Algeria’s diplomatic approach, particularly regarding Israel and Palestine, raise questions about the nation’s genuine commitment to Arab unity. Ultimately, these dynamics reveal a significant transformation in regional relationships, highlighting Morocco’s central role amidst Algeria’s growing irrelevance.
Original Source: www.moroccoworldnews.com
