With the EU’s partial lifting of sanctions on Syria coinciding with a national dialogue, experts caution that complete sanctions relief is essential for reconstruction and political transition. Analysts highlight the severe economic impact of prolonged sanctions and the crucial need for cooperation to stabilize Syria post-conflict. Without lifting sanctions, the nation risks renewed violence and continued suffering for its population.
LONDON: In a significant move ahead of Syria’s national dialogue on February 25, the European Union has agreed to lift certain sanctions on the deposed Bashar Assad regime. Despite this gesture, a comprehensive and permanent lifting of all sanctions remains uncertain, as Western leaders view the formation of an inclusive government implementing necessary reforms with skepticism.
The EU announced on February 24 that it would immediately suspend restrictions on Syria’s oil, gas, electricity, and transport sectors and ease its banking ban for humanitarian transactions. Additionally, five financial entities had their asset freezes lifted, facilitating fund transfers to Syria’s central bank.
This decision coincided with the national dialogue launch by Syria’s interim government, led by President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, who aims to create an inclusive transitional government. Critics noted that while the preparations were rushed, the dialogue attracted around 600 delegates and aimed to draft a new constitution and establish a roadmap for economic recovery.
Experts and rights groups emphasize that lifting sanctions is essential for Syria’s recovery. Nanar Hawach of the International Crisis Group stated, “Lifting sanctions is crucial at this moment to promote a stable and peaceful political transition in Syria.” Ibrahim Al-Assil from the Middle East Institute added that rebuilding Syria’s middle class is vital for political transition and cannot be achieved without lifting sanctions.
Sanctions have severely damaged Syria’s economy, hampering societal functionality. Al-Assil cautioned that extending sanctions would undermine the transitional efforts to build a stable and inclusive future. Human Rights Watch also highlighted that sanctions hinder reconstruction and exacerbate suffering for many Syrians who lack basic necessities.
With over half of Syrians lacking nutritious food and 16.5 million people in need of humanitarian assistance, concerns grow about the potential for an economic collapse without sanctions relief. Karam Shaar from the New Lines Institute warned of an impending crisis if sanctions are not lifted or if foreign funding does not materialize.
While Qatar’s pledge of funds to support Syria’s public sector has been delayed due to ongoing U.S. sanctions, the EU stated that further sanctions relief depends on the interim government’s performance. European officials warned that they might reinstate sanctions if Syria’s new authorities fail to implement reforms.
As the interim government announced a committee for drafting a temporary constitution, analysts noted the challenges ahead in balancing the expectations among various factions. Analysts argue that symbolic gestures alone will not suffice and substantial reforms are necessary.
Media reports suggest that progress in easing sanctions may be delayed, impacting the critical transition phase. Kenneth Roth from Human Rights Watch urged Western governments to lift sanctions without delay but conditioned on Syria’s respect for human rights.
Despite some easing of sanctions, economists warn that prolonged restrictions may jeopardize recovery efforts. Al-Assil emphasized that U.S. sanctions are particularly obstructive, discouraging engagement from other governments and financial institutions. Syria has faced years of sanctions, which have only worsened conditions for the general populace.
In light of the ongoing civil war, the humanitarian crisis remains severe, with poverty affecting 90 percent of the population. While the U.S. Treasury has permitted some transactions with the transitional Syrian government, rapid re-engagement with the global economy is necessary to stabilize the region.
Economic analyst Shaar underscored the need to re-enable financial transactions to reconnect Syria’s banking sector with the global economy, which would be critical for recovery. Otrakji expressed skepticism about significant reductions in U.S. sanctions, highlighting the historical tendency for sanctions to persist once imposed.
Although some Western officials are wary of losing leverage over the new government, Otrakji argues that failing to ease sanctions could hinder vital progress. Al-Sharaa and his government must navigate complex dynamics to foster inclusive governance while managing external expectations regarding human rights.
The lifting of sanctions is framed as imperative for enhancing living conditions for Syrians and rebuilding the nation. While the interim government may take necessary steps, experts believe that sustained economic assistance and lifting sanctions are essential for a successful future for Syria.
In summary, the lifting of sanctions on Syria is a vital step towards achieving political, social, and economic recovery following years of conflict. Experts emphasize that continued sanctions will impede efforts to establish a stable government and alleviate the humanitarian crisis. The international community is urged to reassess its stance on sanctions, aligning its approach with the need for progress and stability in Syria’s recovery.
Original Source: www.arabnews.com
