Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) are intensifying their efforts to legitimize their authority following the establishment of a parallel government in Nairobi. Engaging in diplomatic initiatives, RSF aims to assert its dominance while collaborating with political factions to rebrand itself as a legitimate governing entity. However, its past controversies and the ensuing tensions with the Sudanese military complicate its aspirations for international recognition.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) of Sudan, having established a parallel government in Nairobi, are intensifying their attempt to consolidate power, seen as a strategy to legitimize their authority. Amid an ongoing conflict with the Sudanese army, RSF is pivoting towards diplomatic efforts to assert its position in Sudan’s future governance. Insiders indicate that the RSF plans to claim legitimacy at various international forums, including the United Nations.
Ibrahim al-Mirghani, a supporter of the RSF administration, noted, “If you secure your country and stop the bloodshed, displacement, and terrorism… neighbours will recognise you.” This indicates a strategy focused not solely on military dominance but also on establishing cooperation with the international community. RSF seeks to present itself as a legitimate governing body, defending its claim against the Sudanese army.
Furthermore, RSF aims to position itself as the leader of Sudan’s transition to civilian rule, while fortifying its military presence. Ties with the Taqaddum political faction are a part of their rebranding process, distinguishing RSF from a militia to a recognized government entity. Al-Hadi Idris, leader of a supporting armed group, stated, “Our priority is peace, but the government must defend its citizens.”
RSF’s declaration of its power and intended government structure comes after the recent signing of a political charter in Nairobi, which establishes a framework for a proposed ‘Government of Peace and Unity’. RSF asserts its role as the legitimate government as opposed to a mere parallel entity, despite criticism of its agenda as being motivated by a quest for international acceptance. Idris remarked, “We are not a parallel government, and we are not a government in exile; we are the legitimate government.”
The signing event, which involved notable figures including former Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, has prompted accusations of power maneuvering on the part of RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, also known as Hemedti. Critics contend the event serves as a strategy to gain international legitimacy amidst Sudan’s tumultuous political landscape. The Sudanese military has responded with condemnation, accusing Kenya of bias towards the RSF.
Kenya’s role in hosting the RSF’s signing ceremony has exacerbated tensions with Sudan’s military leadership, which has already expressed discontent over perceived interference. The Sudanese government, controlled by military forces, has issued warnings against Kenya’s involvement, increasing the diplomatic strain. A government official stated, “Kenya has openly favoured one side in this war.”
There are also significant concerns regarding RSF’s historical actions in relation to its purported commitment to democracy. The group has faced allegations of serious human rights violations, including ethnic violence in Darfur. The United Nations has noted RSF’s troubling history, questioning whether its recent diplomatic engagements are sincere or part of a broader authoritarian strategy.
In summary, the Rapid Support Forces are attempting to solidify their control in Sudan by establishing a parallel government in Nairobi and utilizing diplomatic channels to enhance their legitimacy. While seeking recognition as the legitimate governing authority, RSF seeks to distance itself from its militia origins. However, its controversial history raises questions about its commitment to democratic principles. Amidst rising tensions with Sudan’s military, Kenya finds itself navigating a complicated diplomatic landscape.
Original Source: www.kenyans.co.ke
