The PMF Service and Retirement Law in Iraq has stirred political turmoil amidst Shiite factions, reflecting deep divisions over its implications for leadership and retirement. Proponents advocate for its necessity to formalize the PMF, while critics fear exploitation for political agendas. With significant political negotiations underway and public pressure emphasized as a solution, the law’s future holds critical implications for Iraq’s governance and security landscape.
Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) are embroiled in a contentious debate regarding the PMF Service and Retirement Law, especially within Shiite factions. As discussions grow more heated, proposals for a comprehensive approach seek to prevent political exploitation of the law’s provisions regarding retirement age. Public advocacy is being encouraged to mitigate the risk of political manipulation.
Established in 2014 by a fatwa from Shiite cleric Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the PMF was formed to combat ISIS, operating alongside the Iraqi army and international coalitions. The PMF has evolved into a crucial entity in Iraq’s security apparatus, with its funding rising from $2.16 billion in 2021 to an anticipated $2.6 billion for 2023-2025. With around 200,000 members from diverse backgrounds, the PMF has predominantly Shiite affiliation.
In November 2016, the Iraqi parliament enacted the PMF Law, formalizing the PMF’s structure despite opposition from Sunni representatives, who viewed it as detrimental to national unity. This legislation designates the PMF as a supporting force to the Iraqi Armed Forces under the Prime Minister’s authority, officially placing them under military law while prohibiting political activities within the ranks. The law, which has undergone initial readings, aims to ensure job security and retirement benefits for PMF members.
Discontent among factions within the Coordination Framework (CF)—an alliance of Shiite parties—emerges over the approval of the PMF law. Key issues include the law’s lingering status in parliament and its implications for the retirement of Faleh Al-Fayyad, the PMF leader who exceeds the legal age for ministerial roles. Some factions view the legislation as an attempt to diminish current leadership and fragment the PMF; however, proponents advocate for its necessity to regulate the PMF.
The legislative body has seen boycotts from members opposing the PMF Law’s exclusion from discussions as CF leaders conduct sessions to address the legal complexities surrounding it. Recently, Iraq’s Cabinet has forwarded a draft law on the PMF to parliament for consideration. Support for the proposed PMF Retirement and Service Law has emerged, with several political factions, including some Sunni MPs, voicing their approval. Still, concerns linger regarding potential leadership vacancies due to retirements under the law.
The proposed law is expected to retire approximately 400 PMF leaders without immediate replacements. To remedy this, a delay in implementation has been agreed upon to allow time for training and selection of new leadership. Key figures within the PMF are engaged in ongoing discussions, with the law awaiting finalization before a parliamentary vote.
Political analysts have raised alarms about potential electoral manipulation of the PMF Law, specifically citing Article 32/Third, which allows Al-Fayyad ample authority for personnel retirement based on discretion. This provision could lead to retirements of those who do not align with political agendas, prompting calls for careful scrutiny from lawmakers. Amidst these challenges, some factions leverage the law for personal gain, underscoring the need for vigilance in legislative proceedings.
Shiite factions are considering amendments to the PMF Law to ensure its passage while also addressing broader political issues tied to its approval. The proposal includes potential political agreements concerning other contentious legislation in Iraq. Critics note that passing laws as a packaged deal undermines democratic processes, allowing for contentious bills to be approved despite opposition.
The ongoing debate surrounding the PMF Service and Retirement Law reflects deep-seated political divisions within Iraq’s Shiite factions. As factions vie for influence, concerns emerge regarding potential electoral manipulation and the future of leadership within the PMF. The call for public engagement and accountability signifies the importance of civil society in fostering transparent governance and ensuring laws serve the broader populace rather than political interests. The outcome of this legislation will likely shape the PMF’s future and Iraq’s political landscape.
Original Source: shafaq.com
