Egypt, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority have rejected President Trump’s proposal to resettle Palestinian refugees from Gaza. The Egyptian government insists on the rights of Palestinians to remain in their homeland, while public opinion in Egypt opposes the resettlement idea. Jordan’s Foreign Minister emphasizes the necessity of a Palestinian state located on Palestinian soil.
Egypt, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority have collectively dismissed United States President Donald Trump’s recent proposal to relocate residents of Gaza to their territories. The Egyptian government emphasized its commitment to the rights of the Palestinian people, stressing their desire to remain on their own land, in accordance with international law.
Public sentiment in Egypt remains overwhelmingly against the notion of resettling Palestinians within its borders. President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi acknowledged the potential ease of relocating some Palestinians to the Sinai Peninsula; however, he pointed out that widespread opposition among the Egyptian populace would make this impractical.
Khattar Abou Diab, a political science instructor at the University of Paris, underscored that despite Egypt’s economic challenges and potential benefits of the proposal, a large segment of Egyptians would resist such a move. Former American University of Cairo professor Paul Sullivan concurred, stating that accepting this proposal would trigger instability in Egypt and the region.
Similarly, Jordan’s Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi firmly rejected the proposal, asserting that the future of Palestine lies within its own territory, advocating for a sovereign Palestinian state. He maintained that, “Palestine is for the Palestinians and Jordan is for the Jordanians.”
In conclusion, both Egypt and Jordan have responded negatively to President Trump’s proposal to resettle Gaza residents, highlighting a strong commitment to Palestinian sovereignty and the potential for regional instability. The widespread public opposition in Egypt and the official stance from Jordan reflect a collective desire for a solution that upholds the rights of Palestinians to their land. The discourse surrounding this proposal illustrates the complexities involved in addressing the Palestinian issue and the geopolitical sensitivities of the region.
Original Source: www.voanews.com
