Argentina has announced its exit from the World Health Organization, citing disagreements over health management during the pandemic. Following in the footsteps of the U.S. under Trump, President Milei is advocating for greater national sovereignty in health decisions, referencing economic consequences of WHO’s pandemic measures. This move is part of a broader trend of skepticism towards international health governance.
The Argentine government announced its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), following the United States’ similar decision under former President Donald Trump, with whom President Javier Milei shares ideological ties. This action stems from what Milei’s spokesman, Manuel Adorni, termed significant disagreements with the WHO regarding its management during the COVID-19 pandemic, stating that Argentina would not allow foreign entities to dictate its health policies.
Adorni criticized the WHO for imposing extensive lockdown measures without adequate scientific validation, asserting that such quarantines led to severe economic repercussions worldwide. He emphasized Argentina’s need for autonomy in health management, stressing that the decision provides the nation with increased flexibility and resource availability to adapt policies to local conditions.
Argentina’s exit from the WHO is part of a broader ideological alignment with the U.S., particularly under the Trump administration, which expressed similar discontent with the organization. The decision also reflects growing sentiments among countries questioning the WHO’s management and authority, especially notable during global health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. President Milei’s administration is focused on austerity measures and reducing international oversight that may restrict sovereign decision-making in health-related interventions.
In conclusion, Argentina’s withdrawal from the WHO marks a significant shift in its health policy approach, mirroring U.S. actions and reflecting rising nationalist sentiments towards international organizations. While this move may allow Argentina to tailor its policies more effectively, it also highlights tensions in global health governance and the potential consequences for international cooperation in future health emergencies.
Original Source: www.thedailymail.net
