President Prabowo Subianto’s proposal to pardon corrupt individuals who return stolen assets faces criticism from Lakso Anindito of the Indonesia Memanggil 57+ Institute. Anindito argues that such leniency may increase corruption by eliminating deterrents. Prabowo’s proposal seeks to allow corrupt individuals to repent confidentially, but critics contend that it fails to address systemic issues and advocate for stronger legal measures instead.
President Prabowo Subianto’s proposal to pardon corrupt individuals under certain conditions has sparked criticism from various quarters, particularly from Lakso Anindito of the Indonesia Memanggil 57+ Institute (IM57+). Anindito argues that the plan undermines the deterrent effect of penalties for corruption, potentially increasing the frequency of such offenses. He emphasized that providing forgiveness for corrupt acts, even with the requirement to return stolen assets, fails to address the systemic roots of corruption and may encourage individuals to rationalize their criminal actions.
During a speech to Indonesian students at Al-Azhar University, President Prabowo articulated his intention to offer amnesty in exchange for restitution from corruptors, suggesting that an opportunity to repent would promote ethical behavior. As part of the proposal, the identities of those who comply would be kept confidential to encourage participation. However, Anindito, while acknowledging the need for asset recovery, contends that efforts should shift towards strengthening legal frameworks instead of offering leniency. He advocates for assuring the independence of law enforcement to combat corruption effectively, positing that more rigorous measures are necessary to safeguard against fraudulent activities.
Prabowo’s controversial stance was announced following a recent discussion of corruption issues within the country, indicating a broader attempt to tackle corruption while facing balancing acts regarding public perception and legal integrity.
Corruption remains a significant challenge in Indonesia, with high-profile cases often dominating headlines. The judiciary and law enforcement agencies have faced scrutiny regarding their effectiveness and independence in combating this persistent issue. In this context, President Prabowo Subianto’s proposal for a pardon system aims to encourage the return of stolen public assets. Such proposals are often met with skepticism by anti-corruption advocates, as they challenge the principles of accountability and deterrence that undergird the fight against corruption.
In summary, President Prabowo Subianto’s plan to pardon corrupt individuals who comply with asset recovery requirements has incited a wave of criticism. Experts argue that leniency could exacerbate corruption rather than mitigate it, as it diminishes the preventative effects of punitive measures. As the debate continues, a call for a more robust legal approach to combat corruption has taken center stage, emphasizing the need for independence in law enforcement and stricter enforcement of the law to protect public integrity.
Original Source: en.tempo.co
