Ghana’s recent elections exemplify a robust democratic process with high voter turnout and political sportsmanship, contrasting starkly with Nigeria’s problematic electoral history marked by violence and public distrust. While Ghana’s adherence to democratic norms has resulted in stable governance, Nigeria faces challenges that undermine electoral integrity, highlighting a significant need for reform.
The political landscapes of Nigeria and Ghana, two nations that achieved independence closely together, reveal striking contrasts in their electoral processes. Ghana conducted its recent elections on December 7, wherein former President John Mahama was elected with 56.55 percent of the votes, marking a historic moment. Vice-President Mahamudu Bawumia graciously conceded despite ongoing vote counting, exemplifying political sportsmanship and contributing to election integrity. Ghana’s low-key election atmosphere featured no military presence, allowing citizens to vote peacefully, unlike Nigeria where elections are often marred by violence and military lockdowns.
In stark comparison, Nigeria’s electoral history has been characterized by significant controversy and a lack of confidence in its electoral commission, INEC. Despite claims from INEC Chairman Mahmood Yakubu that Ghana has borrowed electoral practices from Nigeria, the implementation in Ghana has led to stable elections while Nigeria suffers from systemic electoral failures. The African Union noted Ghana’s adherence to democratic principles, whereas the EU criticized Nigeria’s recent elections as lacking transparency and inclusivity, highlighting public distrust.
Historically, Nigerian elections have been plagued by irregularities, with the unyielding dominance of ruling parties perpetuating cycles of incompetence. The scenario contrasts sharply with Ghana, where voters have actively removed ineffective leaders. The poor voter turnout in Nigeria, which was at 26.7 percent in the 2023 presidential elections compared to Ghana’s 60.9 percent in the 2024 elections, underscores public disenchantment with the electoral process. Overall, Ghana’s adherence to electoral laws and active civic engagement stands as a model for Nigeria, which must aspire to such democratic integrity.
The examination of electoral differences between Ghana and Nigeria highlights the crucial role that political culture plays in shaping democratic outcomes. Ghana’s journey towards a competitive electoral system has been marked by substantial civic participation and political accountability. In contrast, Nigeria has faced persistent challenges stemming from electoral malpractice and a lack of faith in its governance structures, which have significantly impacted voter engagement and democratic legitimacy. Understanding these contrasting political environments is essential for evaluating the effectiveness and integrity of electoral processes in West Africa.
The disparities between Nigerian and Ghanaian electoral processes showcase contrasting commitments to democratic principles and public trust. Ghana’s recent elections illustrate effective civic engagement and political integrity, with a significant voter turnout indicative of public confidence. On the other hand, Nigeria’s struggle with electoral malpractice underscores the need for systemic reforms to rebuild trust and foster a democratic culture. Ghana serves as a precedent for Nigeria to aspire to in its pursuit of true democratic ideals.
Original Source: punchng.com
