Israel and Lebanon are reportedly nearing a ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah, proposing a 60-day truce that includes troop withdrawals and increased Lebanese army presence. Despite escalating violence, including rocket fire and airstrikes, there is optimism about the ceasefire agreement progressing, although internal opposition in Israel complicates matters.
Recent developments indicate that Israel and Lebanon may soon finalize a ceasefire agreement aimed at resolving ongoing hostilities with Hezbollah, the Iranian-aligned militia. The Israeli cabinet is scheduled to convene on Tuesday to deliberate over a proposed 60-day truce, which would involve the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon and a cessation of Hezbollah activities in the region. This ceasefire follows an escalation in military exchanges, highlighted by recent rocket attacks from Lebanon into Israel and subsequent airstrikes by the Israeli Air Force targeting Hezbollah positions in Beirut and other areas.
The impending deal is said to potentially increase the presence of the Lebanese army in areas vacated by Israeli forces and Hezbollah, as disclosed by a Western diplomat who requested anonymity. Lebanese deputy parliamentary speaker, Elias Bou Saab, mentioned that the current environment lacks significant barriers to a ceasefire. The contentious issue of monitoring the agreement has reportedly been resolved, establishing a committee involving five countries, including France, with oversight by the United States.
However, discussions have been complicated by Israel’s demand for the right to execute military actions in Lebanon should it detect Hezbollah reestablishing its presence south of the Litani River or preparing for attacks. Though this provision is unpopular among both Hezbollah and the Lebanese government, U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein has indicated an urgency in concluding the ceasefire.
Moreover, internal opposition within Israel persists, particularly from National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who has criticized the ceasefire negotiations, perceiving a unique opportunity to decisively diminish Hezbollah’s capabilities while they are at a disadvantage. Since the escalation of conflict in late September, Lebanese officials have called for agreements to adhere strictly to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, established after the 2006 conflict, which mandates the removal of Hezbollah’s fighters from specific regions.
The tragic toll of this conflict has been substantial, with over 3,750 fatalities and at least 15,600 injuries reported in Lebanon since October 2023, in addition to more than a million individuals displaced by violence. Recent skirmishes have resulted in casualties and damage in northern and central Israel, coinciding with deadly airstrikes in Beirut.
The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah has escalated significantly since late September, leading to calls for a ceasefire. The situation is complex, involving political, military, and humanitarian considerations. Hezbollah, backed by Iran, has been engaged in aggressive actions against Israel, prompting a fierce military response. The backdrop includes historical tensions rooted in previous conflicts and unresolved issues following United Nations Resolution 1701, which was intended to stabilize the region following the 2006 war. This current conflict has resulted in grave humanitarian crises in both Lebanon and Israel, necessitating urgent discussions for peace and stability.
In conclusion, a potential ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon appears to be on the horizon, aiming to mitigate the ongoing violence involving Hezbollah. While diplomatic progress has been made with respect to monitoring and troop withdrawals, multiple complications remain, notably concerning Israel’s military strategy and internal political opposition. The humanitarian impact of the conflict underscores the necessity for a sustainable resolution, emphasizing the urgent need for negotiation to restore peace in the region.
Original Source: www.bbc.co.uk
