Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon has accused some European countries of complicity in the deadly pager attacks attributed to Israel. The ambassador denied Iran’s involvement, indicating that the pagers originated from Taiwan. The attacks resulted in over 37 deaths and more than 3,000 injuries, leading to international condemnation and raising questions about the legal implications of military actions against civilians.
Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon, Mojtaba Amani, has leveled serious allegations against some European nations, claiming they are complicit in the recent deadly pager attacks attributed to Israel which occurred in September. Amani, who suffered injuries during the attacks, denied any linkage between these devices and Iran, asserting that the pagers were sourced from Taiwan, and not bought from Iran. The explosions led to massive casualties, with over 37 fatalities and thousands of injuries, provoking international condemnation. In his statements to Iran’s IRNA news agency, Amani suggested that various European states were involved in the operational aspects of the attack, although he refrained from naming specific countries. He indicated that investigations are ongoing in Bulgaria and Norway, while a Hungarian company is suspected of manufacturing the pagers used in the assault. Furthermore, Amani disclosed a theory that the pagers’ cargo underwent tampering while in transit, with Israel allegedly substituting the original devices. The ambassadorship dismissed claims of Hezbollah’s acquisition of military-grade components, specifying that the pagers were intended for civilian use. The Iranian envoy emphasized that the devices were sold widely within the civilian community, including educational institutions, disputing accusations of military involvement. This assertion came amid reports that Hezbollah may have imported the devices without following regulatory protocols in Lebanon, which indicated a breach of national telecom laws. Amani described the blasts as destructive and unprecedented in Lebanon’s recent history, taking place shortly before Israel launched a broader military assault against the country. He criticized the Israeli government’s tactics and claimed the incident was an egregious violation of humanitarian law. Following the explosions, Amani noted that he received an alert that triggered the device to detonate, resulting in personal injuries, further fueling suspicions regarding the hazardous nature of these pagers. Despite the tragic outcome of this operation, Amani argued, “The strike that Netanyahu wanted to deliver with such malice failed,” signaling Hezbollah’s resilience amidst the chaos. The incidents have led to international scrutiny of Israel’s military actions and their impact on civilian populations in Lebanon.
The pager attacks in Lebanon represent a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict involving Hezbollah, Israel, and Iran. Following years of intermittent violence, the September 2023 incidents, characterized by lethal explosions targeting primarily Hezbollah members, resulted in widespread casualties. These attacks have heightened tensions in the region and prompted international outcry regarding the use of military explosives in civilian contexts. Iran’s ambassador’s assertions regarding European nations’ involvement reflect the complexities of geopolitical alliances and the intricate dynamics influencing the conflict. The accusations against foreign governments add another layer to the already fraught diplomatic relationships surrounding this issue, underscoring the contentious nature of security in the Middle East.
The allegations made by Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon against certain European states regarding their potential involvement in the deadly pager attacks have sparked concern and debate. The devastating impact of these explosions, resulting in significant loss of life and injury, highlights the severe implications of military tactics in civilian settings, as well as the urgent need for accountability in armed conflicts. The ongoing investigations and geopolitical ramifications of these claims suggest that the situation in Lebanon remains precarious, with broader implications for regional stability and international relations.
Original Source: www.newarab.com
